Explore ReFED Insights Engine
(Last Updated 10/29/2024)
Connecticut Food Waste Policy
Connecticut Date Labeling Regulations
Rating: Moderate Policy
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 22-197b; Conn. Agencies Regs. §22-133-131; Conn. Agencies Regs. § 22-133-123; Regs. Conn. State Agencies § 19a-36h-2; 2022 FDA Food Code 3-202.18
In addition to those date labels required under the FDA model Food Code provisions adopted by Connecticut, Connecticut requires date labeling on dairy products. Connecticut requires that dairy products not manufactured, packaged and heat treated in a manner that makes the product safe to store at room temperature are marked with a "last sale date." Neither sale nor donation is restricted for past date dairy products. However, the sale or donation of past date reduced oxygen packaging items and refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food is prohibited.
Overview
Date labels are the dates on food packaging that are accompanied by phrases such as "use by," "best before," "sell by," "enjoy by," and "expires on." Date labels are almost entirely unregulated under federal law, except for infant formula and some very limited instances related to poultry and egg products.
The U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publishes a model Food Code, to help states regulate restaurants, food service providers, and food retailers to ensure the safe handling of food. Nearly every state has adopted a version of the FDA Food Code that requires date labeling for molluscan shellfish and foods in reduced oxygen packaging, as well as the marking of certain refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety foods to indicate the day by which the food should be consumed or discarded.
Shucked shellfish packages smaller than ½ gallon must be marked with a “sell by" or "best if used by" date, and shucked shellfish packages with capacity of ½ gallon or more must be labeled with the date of shucking.
Food in reduced oxygen packaging generally must be labeled with the earlier of a “use-by" date not more than 30 days from the date of packaging or the original manufacturer’s “sell by” date. In states that have adopted the 2009 FDA Food Code or a prior version, the “use-by" date cannot be not more than 14 days from the date of packaging or the original manufacturer’s “sell by” date. The sale or donation of past date reduced oxygen packaging items is prohibited.
Refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours generally must be marked to indicate the day by which the food should be consumed or discarded.
Because federal law is so limited, states have broad discretion to regulate date labels, which has resulted in a patchwork of date label regulation across the United States. The inconsistency in date label laws, for foods other than those mentioned above, leads to food waste because consumers may discard food after the date on the package due to confusion about product safety and retailers or manufacturers may discard food due to confusion about selling or donating the past-date food. Also, some states explicitly prohibit or limit the donation of past date foods.
Connecticut Liability Protection Regulations
Rating: Moderate Policy
Donations made within the state are protected from liability according to the federal Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act.
Overview
The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act, as amended by the Food Donation Improvement Act, provides a strong federal baseline of protection for food donors against state and federal liability claims. It covers individuals, businesses, schools, nonprofit organizations, the officers of businesses and nonprofit organizations, and gleaners. A donor must donate in good faith to a nonprofit organization that distributes the donated food to needy populations, or, if the donor is a qualified direct donor, they may donate food directly to needy individuals. Donated food must meet all quality and labeling standards imposed by federal, state and local laws and regulations. A state’s liability protection law can provide more, but not less, protection than the Emerson Act.
Connecticut TAX INCENTIVES
Rating: No Policy
Connecticut does not offer additional tax incentives beyond federal incentives.
Overview
The federal government provides tax deductions to incentivize businesses to donate food. As of December 2015, all businesses—including C-corporations, S-corporations, limited liability corporations (LLCs), partnerships and sole proprietorships—are eligible for an enhanced tax deduction that exceeds the property’s basis for donated food if they meet certain requirements. If they do not meet the requirements, they can still claim a general tax deduction in the amount of the property’s basis.
Connecticut FOOD SAFETY
Rating: Weak Policy
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 26-78a
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 26-78a details food safety standards for donating game meat; and the Department of Education Offers Guidance on share tables in schools
Overview
States often base their food safety regulations on the model food safety regulations for restaurants and retail stores within the FDA Food Code. While the Food Code states that food donation is permitted, it does not specify which food safety laws or regulations pertain to the food donation context. Without guidance or clarity coming from a governmental entity, food donors will often refuse to donate their safe, wholesome food. States vary broadly in terms of the level of guidance they provide on food safety rules for food donation, often providing limited guidance for a specialized context, such as share tables in schools, or no guidance at all.
Connecticut Animal Feed Regulations
Rating: Moderate Policy
Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 22-320a–g
All materials containing meat must be heat treated for 30 minutes at 212 degrees Fahrenheit or treated by some other method approved by the state prior to feeding to swine. Annual animal-derived treated waste feeding permits must be obtained, but exceptions exist for individuals feeding household waste to swine. There are no restrictions on feeding waste exclusively vegetable in nature.
Overview
For centuries, using food scraps as animal feed was common worldwide. The practice declined rapidly in the 1980s, when several disease outbreaks were linked to unsafe animal feed. In an attempt to prevent the spread of such diseases, federal laws and regulations were enacted to restrict what is often pejoratively referred to as “garbage feeding” to animals. However, using food scraps as animal feed in a safe, resource-efficient way can be environmentally friendly and energy-efficient, providing multiple benefits for both farmers and food waste generators, such as retailers, restaurants, and institutional cafeterias. Under federal law, food scraps can generally be fed to animals, so long as food scraps with animal derived by-products are heat-treated by a licensed facility before being fed to swine; and food scraps containing animal-derived by-products are not fed to ruminants. The federal regulations function as a floor, and most state regulations go beyond them.
Connecticut Organic Waste Recycling Laws
Rating: Weak Policy
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 22a-226e
Any commercial food wholesaler or distributor, industrial food manufacturer or processor, supermarket, resort, or conference center that produces at least 26 tons/year of source separated organic waste must separate its organic waste and ensure proper recycling at an authorized composting facility. Through January 1, 2025, exceptions apply if the waste producer is located more than 20 miles away from an authorized composting facility. Beginning January 1, 2025, the 20 mile exemption will be eliminated and institutions producing more than 26 tons/year of source separated organic waste will be covered.
Overview
In order to push businesses and consumers to reduce food waste, a growing number of states and localities are enacting organic waste bans or waste recycling laws to restrict the amount of food waste an entity can send to the landfill. However, each state differs regarding the specifics of its waste ban or recycling law. For example, they vary with regard to the types of entities covered under the law, how much organic waste an entity must produce in order to be covered, and whether exceptions exist for entities located far from a facility that accepts food scraps. These differences have a significant impact on the reach of these laws, and therefore on the amount of food waste diverted.